Eos bornea Linnaeus, 1758
Subspecies and Distribution:
Two subspecies recognized.
Eos bornea bornea (Linnaeus, 1758) – S Moluccas (Boano, Seram, Ambon, Haruku, Saparua, Banda Island, Seram Laut Island, Watubela Island, Tayandu Island, Kai Island).
Eos bornea cyanonotha (Vieillot, 1818) – S Moluccas (Buru).
Small introduced population (unknown subspecies) in Taiwan.
Various populations have been awarded separate races on basis of purported size differences, but variability within these populations, or evidence of clines, suggests that size cannot be used as a subspecific character. Proposed races bernsteini (Kai Island) and rothschildi (Seram) invalid, as differences due to clinal variation.
Not globally threatened. CITES II, Least concern.
The population is suspected to be in decline owing to unsustainable levels of exploitation. Decreasing.
Eos bornea bornea
Almost entirely red.
The area surrounding the vent and undertail coverts are cobalt-blue.
The upperside of the tail brownish-red. the underside is brown-red.
The wings are variable with blue and black.
Primaries are black with the speculum red.
Secondaries are red, broadly tipped with black.
And the greater wing coverts are blue , also the scapulars in some specimens.
Beak is orange.
The cere , skin around the eye and feet are grey.
The iris is orange-red.
The most common of the Eos species, and breed also better then the other Eos species.
No natural mutation, but in Australia they bred the lutino in the buru red lory subspecies, from the Trichoglossus moluccanus. I personally don't like this kind of mutations crossing-over, and don't think it would be a great mutation in the red lory, as the red stay the same, only the blue and black will be white. (Pictures you can see below at the buru red lory.)
6,5 - 7 mm
Eos bornea cyanonotha
Buru red lory
And the red is a darker shade then the nominate.
Also the blue is more cobalt.
Very rare, and many have being crossed with the nominate. In Europe almost gone.
6,5 - 7 mm